It is possible and sometimes appropriate to add a commercial and reasonable point of view to the interpretation of the contract. The interpretation of contracts in English law is an area of English contract law, where it is a question of how the courts decide what an agreement means. According to settled case-law, the procedure is based on the objective opinion of a reasonable person in the context in which the parties concluded their agreement. This approach marks a break with earlier rigid interpretations of the 1970s, in which the courts paid more attention to the formal expression of the parties` intentions and looked more verbatim at what they had said. If, in view of the explicit terms of the agreement, it is still not possible to determine its meaning, the Tribunal may be prepared to suggest certain conditions.20 However, courts are reluctant to depart from the explicit wording, particularly where the contract is detailed and appears to be complete. However, the Supreme Court has clarified that the starting point is the natural importance of the language used; Common sense cannot be used to underestimate the importance of the language of the disposition to be interpreted. The courts will only slowly object to the importance of a provision only because one of the parties has done bad business; It is not for the Tribunal to improve the positions of the parties in rewriting the contract9 In the event of ambiguity and construction as much as possible, however, the Tribunal chooses the most economically sound interpretation, assuming that the parties do not intend to achieve a non-commercial result10 This is a clause that subordinates the agreement itself to certain issues (for example: For example, a land sales contract in which the purchase is subject to the seller obtaining the building permit until a certain date) or a clause makes the operation of certain contractual clauses subject to certain issues (e.g. .